🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of votes that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went somewhat badly for him, where the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year backed Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured it could exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does so then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really surprised me. The independent held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on the island who had a high participation. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. But overall, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.