🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam order, the highest judicial body permitted Texas to use a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that is projected to include up to five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three decision, released on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to overturn a federal judge's ruling that had invalidated the new map in November.

Court's Reasoning

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing much confusion and disturbing the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the order stated in detailing its decision.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely classified voters based on their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the new maps. It had ordered the state to employ the maps created after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Strong Dissent

Through a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She stated that it disregarded the work of the district court, noting that its ruling was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a breach of the constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Battle

The ruling comes amid a countrywide fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican control. Typically, map-drawing takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a wave among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that could add a number of more GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas top lawyer hailed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes favorable to the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

Conversely, Democratic leaders decried the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

A leading Democratic leader said the court had another time shredded its legitimacy by approving a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.